Response to Reviewers ' Comments :

نویسندگان

  • Juergen Borlak
  • Giuseppe Novelli
  • Rumiko Matsuoka
چکیده

We now continued our search in the 609 bp 3'-UTR region of GATA4 to explore further molecular avenues leading to CHD. Background: To identify further genetic alterations associated with CHD, we continued our search in the 609 bp of 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of GATA4. 2. The authors should modify Table 3, indicating with a different character (for example in bold) the new sequence variations in the coding region of GATA4 in this manuscript. Response: Table 3 has been modified. 3. The authors should add in the discussion section a comment, based on the result summarized in Table 3, regarding the possibility of a genotype-phenotype correlation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers

The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...

متن کامل

ارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389

  Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....

متن کامل

معیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سال‌های 92-90

Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...

متن کامل

Response to the Reviewers’ comments

In this document we provide responses to the comments made by the two anonymous Reviewers on our manuscript “Delayed protein synthesis reduces the correlation between mRNA and protein fluctuations”, which we submitted for publication to the Biophysical Journal. Each individual comment made by the Reviewers is listed below and is immediately followed by our response to it. We would like to thank...

متن کامل

Author’s response to reviews Title: Quality of life in hemodialysis diabetic patients: A multicenter cross-sectional study from Palestine Authors:

Title: Quality of life in hemodialysis diabetic patients: A multicenter cross-sectional study from Palestine Authors: Sohaib Khatib ([email protected]) Mohammad Hemadneh ([email protected]) Samer Hasan ([email protected]) Emad Khazneh ([email protected]) Sa'ed Zyoud ([email protected]) Version: 2 Date: 05 Dec 2017 Author’s response to reviews: Dear editor Editor-in-Chief ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007